Skip to main content

Articles and Tax Tips

Though IRS Publication 463 indicates that payers may or may not include expenses reimbursed to a contractor on the 1099 issued to the payee, when it comes to handling reimbursements to your own employees the IRS is a bit clearer….

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

1099 reporting professionals to benefit from expert consultation paired with innovative tax software solutions

Convey Compliance Systems and TIR Consulting LLC today announced a strategic partnership. Each company offers a unique set of products and services that together will enable organizations to reduce the costs and risks associated with 1099 reporting.

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

For far too long information reporters have been debating where to report hotel payments on the Form 1099-MISC; in box 1 or in box 7? In spite of the presence of this debate there is only one box in which you should be reporting payments made to hotels….

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

The Internal Revenue Service is seeking public comment on how to most effectively carry out recent Form 1099 reporting related changes in the law. These changes, starting in 2012, will require businesses to report a wider range of payments to contractors, vendors and others. Consequently, the IRS is seeking guidance, through your comments, so as to better implement the new laws and avoid putting an excessive burden on both you and the IRS. Comments are requested on the following topics:

 
1.) P-Cards: Under a proposed regulation, many business purchases made with credit or debit cards would be exempt from the new reporting requirement because they are already reported by banks and other payment processors. The IRS seeks comments on additional circumstances in which duplicate reporting might otherwise occur and on rules that would prevent such duplicate reporting.

2.) The March 2010 change, effective 2012, requiring expanded existing reporting requirements to include a business’s payments related to goods and other property.
 
3.) The March 2010 change, effective 2012, requiring expanded information reporting requirements to most corporations (with exceptions for legal and medical service providers notwithstanding these payments are currently exempt from reporting).

There are three ways to submit comments, including by email so act now as the deadline to respond is September 29, 2010. Further details are in IRS Notice 2010-51.

 

 

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

On June 2, 2010 The Internal Revenue Service (”IRS”) announced the long awaited change in procedures for individual payees to follow for obtaining validation of social security numbers (“SSNs”) from the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) to prevent or stop backup withholding under section 3406 of the Internal Revenue Code following receipt of a second “B-notice” from a payor. 

 
This announcement (Announcement 2010-41) follows last year’s decision by the SSA to discontinue Form SSA-7028, ostensibly because the SSA legal team determined SSA-7028 lacked the ability to qualify as proper third party notification. Such a huge change had left many unanswered questions for those of you processing IRS B-Notices; questions that can now be answered. Though the Information Reporting Advisory Committee (IRPAC) spoke with both the IRS and SSA, and issued a letter to the IRS on May 15, 2009 seeking further guidance and making several logical requests for clarification and guidance moving forward regarding processing 2nd B-Notices; it was only on June 2nd that the IRS announced their new recommendations.
 
The following article will first summarize Form SSA-7028’s previous role in the processing of a B-Notice (a notice that the name/TIN combination submitted on an information return has failed to match either IRS or SSA records). Then, it will explain what Announcement 2010-41 (which will be published in IRB 2010-25 on June 21, 2010) means for you in regards to not only how you process this spring’s B-Notices but also revamping your B-Notice processing policies and procedures.

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

By Steven D. Mercatante Esq.

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

The IRS TIN Matching Program tells you whether the name-TIN combination your payee provided is a match with a valid name-TIN combination in government files. Thus, it may seem like if you are using the TIN Match Program to check a particular payee's information then it is redundant to request a completed W-9 from the same vendor. Is it?

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

Our very own Steven Mercatante Esq. is the expert speaker for a Free upcoming webinar answering your state reporting compliance questions. This webinar is offered by Convey Compliance Systems on May 13, 2010 from 2pm-3pm EST.

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

For many of us Transmitter Control Codes (TCC) are an integral part of filing season and are relatively easy to use. That said, don’t let simple mistakes trip you up. For instance, do you know what to do when faced with filing for both your company and its affiliates?

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]

This issue is quite common and brings up an IRS method for reporting income based upon the doctrine of “constructive receipt.” Under this doctrine, the payment amount should be reported..

[Full text available to TIR Answer Center subscribers. Subscribe to read full article.]